Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Discuss pedigrees, post photos, and etc...
houndnhorse
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 2:04 am
Location: Nevada
Location: Elko, NV

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby houndnhorse » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:19 pm

The problem is, by the time you convince everyone that you have it, you have probably lost it. :lol:
martindalehounds@yahoo.com
At least as good as I was yesterday
cobalt
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 2:24 pm
Location: SW Id.

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby cobalt » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:32 pm

I've heard that Van Johnson's strain(esp. the blue colored ones) come from Sm. Riv. Diamond Jim.
Big Mike
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 513
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: New Mexico
Location: Southern NM

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby Big Mike » Mon Mar 01, 2010 2:51 pm

Dont know who would have the original strain of blues.

But IMO to have your own strain or line with in a breed or just mix bred you have to have been line breeding long enough that there is some kind of identifiable consistancy in the offspring like body structure, size, color.

Establishing ones own line is near impossible to do without some outside help. Like horsenhound said by the time you got it, you lost it haha
liontracker
Babble Mouth
Babble Mouth
Posts: 2052
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:49 pm
Location: CO
Location: Durango, CO

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby liontracker » Mon Mar 01, 2010 4:47 pm

pegleg
Babble Mouth
Babble Mouth
Posts: 2211
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:34 am
Location: SE.AZ
Facebook ID: 0

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby pegleg » Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:58 pm

How about the term dryground? Dryground is dry ground in an arid envronment, 10-15% relative humidity or less. All else is bareground, yet it is missused every day also.

yes it is. this mix up of terms can be misleading dry ground and bare ground are totally different animals most times. here if I go to the higher altitudes I can find bare ground and its easier on the hounds but you get a cat traveling through the lower hill country and thats dry ground for sure. I get a kick out of "dry" ground lion pics with the cat sittin in a big ol' evergreen either they trailed that cat a looong ways or it's bare ground.
minero
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:19 am
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Torrreon, Coahuila, Mexico
Contact:

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby minero » Thu Apr 15, 2010 1:32 am

Hi,

Well to my understanding, you get to have a strain when you get contant with what you are looking for, for example, the offsprings of your hounds have the same confromation, intelligence, mouth, nose, track, etc.
Just like Cameron´s hounds, he bread to his own standard, he culled what other people wouldn´t of culled, but you see a pic, and usually you can say that´s a cameron hound!,
Like Cascade hounds, they came from Cameron, but he is breeding according to him what should be best for his likings, and in not the so long run, we are going to see that his hounds are difrent than cameron´s because he might keep a hound that Cameron might cull, and viceversa, he might cull a hound that Cameron might keep.
Hope I made my self clear, as you can see I am from Mexico, and english is my second language.

Saludos

Minero
Riverbottom
Tight Mouth
Tight Mouth
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:03 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby Riverbottom » Thu Apr 15, 2010 2:00 pm

User avatar
007pennpal
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 652
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 6:01 am
Location: Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, Montana, Indiana, Ohio, BC
Location: North America

Re: Who has the right to say they have an original strain

Postby 007pennpal » Wed May 05, 2010 2:32 am

Let me ask another question... If we take a winning strand or line of dogs and don't hunt or cull just reproduce them what will we have after ten generations? Will it match the original designed for a purpose?

My point proves only one thing. Dogs are only as good as the breeder. That's why, after generations, a breeder like Del Cameron is famous. His selectiveness engineered what we now hold as a fine example of a big game mountain hound. We as houndsmen must attempt to only breed the best examples we can find and not breed without purpose. I am not the expert and I don't know how to do everything right. Not yet, but I will keep trying.
Sgt. Michael's Kennel
Lead The Way
503-510-2910
seancmichael@aol.com

Return to “Bluetick Coonhounds”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests