Apparently the Natural Resources committee has been getting a lot of phone calls. I talked to Patty today, and will be faxing my letter in the morning. I will also Fed Ex the original to them to be certain it gets there in time for next Tuesday.
When I said I wanted to send in a letter, she said "I am assuming this is for 1221?"
Keep the calls/letters coming in. It might just work.
BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
-
M Evertsen
- Bawl Mouth
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:27 pm
- Location: Nevada
- Location: Somewhere looking for my dogs in the mountains of
Re: BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor. - Vince Lombardi
Re: BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
Last edited by Dale T on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
Mr. Noyes,
I hope you are a man of your word. I got some questions for you. Why are you waiting until just before the hearing to air your footage? You are no stranger to interviewing and reporting stories on hunters that use hounds, whats your stance on SB(1221)? Do you support or oppose the use of hunting with hounds in California?
I hope you are a man of your word. I got some questions for you. Why are you waiting until just before the hearing to air your footage? You are no stranger to interviewing and reporting stories on hunters that use hounds, whats your stance on SB(1221)? Do you support or oppose the use of hunting with hounds in California?
Re: BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
Last edited by Dale T on Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Tom A
Re: BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
Mr. Noyes here is reason to support us. My daughter and her pups that are going to be future bear hunters by God. Dont break her heart please.
Sent from my C771 using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my C771 using Tapatalk 2
-
Liz ODell
- Open Mouth
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 10:22 pm
- Location: First Nations
- Location: My peoples land...forever.
Re: BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
I'm hoping for the same, a fair non-biased article, it's unfortunate that it usually seems when it comes to the media a fair non-biased article is about as easy to find as chicken teeth.
I'm hoping he will surprise us with a decent report...I'll keep the faith until I read it for myself, then I'll pass my judgment (hmmmm...not passing judgment, hell, if everyone would do that then there would be no SB1221 would there?).
But Dan that article that started the whole AB2110 debacle was certainly not what I would call un-biased, not in a million years
I'm hoping he will surprise us with a decent report...I'll keep the faith until I read it for myself, then I'll pass my judgment (hmmmm...not passing judgment, hell, if everyone would do that then there would be no SB1221 would there?).
But Dan that article that started the whole AB2110 debacle was certainly not what I would call un-biased, not in a million years
-
mark miller
- Silent Mouth
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:34 am
- Location: california
Re: BILL INTRODUCED TO BAN PURSUIT OF BEAR AND BOBCAT IN CA
Dr Dan Noyes,
I don't see how you would have two sides to a issue if one side never participated in, or observed the sport of hound hunting. That to me is like not ever watching a football game, let alone participating in one and then saying that it should be outlawed because it's to violent . The two sides, the good and bad should come from people that have participated in the sport. The other people are just speculating on there side which is never good. I just say that people want to give the bears side of the issue that will never happen, bears don't have the emotional ability to give there opinion. If we had commonsense in the main stream news, it wouldn't stir people up. They are there to make controversy and make things look worse than they are, to stir emotions which isn't good for us. As you can see its hard to score when you are always playing defense which hunters in general have been doing for some years now. Tides are changing, hope all hounds man show up in Sac. on april 24th to witness the change.
I don't see how you would have two sides to a issue if one side never participated in, or observed the sport of hound hunting. That to me is like not ever watching a football game, let alone participating in one and then saying that it should be outlawed because it's to violent . The two sides, the good and bad should come from people that have participated in the sport. The other people are just speculating on there side which is never good. I just say that people want to give the bears side of the issue that will never happen, bears don't have the emotional ability to give there opinion. If we had commonsense in the main stream news, it wouldn't stir people up. They are there to make controversy and make things look worse than they are, to stir emotions which isn't good for us. As you can see its hard to score when you are always playing defense which hunters in general have been doing for some years now. Tides are changing, hope all hounds man show up in Sac. on april 24th to witness the change.
Return to “Big Game Hunting With Dogsâ€
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests