legal to shoot to defend dogs from wolves
-
snowy river black and tan
- Bawl Mouth

- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 1:00 am
- Facebook ID: 0
- Location: weiser Idaho
Lets do the math
The montana wolf tags have been reported to sell in the $19-20 dollar / tag.
Lets say for example 3000 tags are sold in the state?
that comes to 60,000
Lets say a dozen tags are filled during the general seasson cause that is what has been proposed harvest dates.
That means that we will pay the fish&game 5000/wolf if a dozen wolves are possibly harvested in the 09 season and if only 3000 tags are sold.
Do you see were this is going we not only paid huge dollars to reintrduce a
predator that was already here in montana. But will now pay big money to try and remove them. Can't be done.
My question is were is all that revenue going to go.
There has never been a big game animal in the history of man kind that has or will generated so much money(per individual harvested) for the F&Game and produces so little return for the public. HAVE YOU EVER FED YOUR FAMILY A WOLF.
Yummy
But mark my words every hunter west of the devide including myself is going to buy that lottery ticket.
The montana wolf tags have been reported to sell in the $19-20 dollar / tag.
Lets say for example 3000 tags are sold in the state?
that comes to 60,000
Lets say a dozen tags are filled during the general seasson cause that is what has been proposed harvest dates.
That means that we will pay the fish&game 5000/wolf if a dozen wolves are possibly harvested in the 09 season and if only 3000 tags are sold.
Do you see were this is going we not only paid huge dollars to reintrduce a
predator that was already here in montana. But will now pay big money to try and remove them. Can't be done.
My question is were is all that revenue going to go.
There has never been a big game animal in the history of man kind that has or will generated so much money(per individual harvested) for the F&Game and produces so little return for the public. HAVE YOU EVER FED YOUR FAMILY A WOLF.
Yummy
But mark my words every hunter west of the devide including myself is going to buy that lottery ticket.
- cecil j.
- Open Mouth

- Posts: 550
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:00 am
- Facebook ID: 0
- Location: olympia wa 98501
- Contact:
Re: legal to shoot to defend dogs from wolves
ya know I just don`t understand it ; I dang sure wouldn`t need a law too cover my tail if my dog was getten atacked by a wolf/ nope I`d put his lights out with-out hesatartion and burry him as deep as I could burry him. My dogs life comes first in that kind of instance ta hey with the law it ain`t loosen ole buddie,nop I would be out a dog ~So I`d be putten that critters lights pdq .Emily wrote:coming to Montana, Wyoming, Idaho this month! http://www.jacksonholenews.com/article.php?art_id=2838
Wolf rule in effect
print page | send as email | email editor
By Cory Hatch Jackson Hole, Wyoming
March 11, 2008
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials announced Friday that a revised rule governing wolf conflicts in Wyoming, Idaho and Montana is now in effect.
The “10(j) rule” stays in effect until the Rocky Mountain gray wolf loses Endangered Species Act protection; it gives the states increased authority to kill wolves for harming wild elk herds and allows individuals on private or public land to kill a wolf if the animal is attacking their livestock or dogs, according to a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service news release.
Environmental groups have called the modified rule a “de facto delisting.”
The rule was published in the Federal Register on Jan. 27. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officials announced the delisting of the gray wolf Feb. 21.
Barring an injunction, the delisting goes into effect in late March. A number of conservation groups have joined in a lawsuit that would prevent the federal government from removing wolves from Endangered Species Act protection. Environmentalists say the Idaho and Wyoming wolf-management plans would allow wildlife managers to kill too many wolves.
Under the final 10(j) rule, state wildlife managers would normally need to send a proposal to Fish and Wildlife each time they want to kill wolves for harming elk herds. The proposal would then be reviewed by five independent scientific experts and sent out for public comment.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Wyoming officials say Wyoming wildlife managers will try to enact a management protocol that would allow the states to specify a number of conditions that, when met, would allow the state to kill wolves for harassing elk without scientists’ review or public comments in each case.
A copy of the revision can be viewed at www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/species/mammals/wolf/.
the relevant paragraph reads as follows:
The 2008 modification to the 2005 nonessential experimental population rule became effective on February 27th, 2008. That rule only applies in the experimental population areas of State’s with approved wolf management plans. It allows anyone on private or public land to legally shoot a wolf in the act of attacking their stock animals [horses, mules, donkeys, llamas, and goats] [color=red]or their dog [any breed][/color]. Such incidents must be reported within 24 hours. In addition, the modification provides a science-based process for the States or Tribes to proposed wolf removal if wolves are demonstrated to be having a major impact on wild ungulate herds.
[/u]
