BigGameHoundsmen.com

Lance Bell wrote: In my opinion you have all done enough to lose some to most all your own hound hunting rights in your own states, so I think we can do without your "expertice" on these matters!!! ( please pm me to gripe don't ruin this post anymore by bashing me....)

This was put out as a request for feed back. He received his feed back and who is to blame if he didn't like the opinions he got? I have learned at least one thing from living all over the country at various times. Hound hunters are the same everywhere. The only thing special about Idaho is the people you share the state with. Not some special out reach program the idaho houndsmen are doing. If you only wanted input from people from Idaho, it should have been posted in the Idaho section.

T.Hunt wrote: Most of the negative posts towards this subject have been nothing more than negativity. You went as far as putting some thought into a differet solution. Thank you very much for your imput.

Negative isn't synonmous with irrelevant. You posted something requesting feedback and didn't get what you anticipated.

Bearkiller wrote:

Lance Bell wrote: Negative isn't synonmous with irrelevant. You posted something requesting feedback and didn't get what you anticipated.

Bearkiller;
You are right, I did anticipate full support from everyone. I did ask for feedback from everyone and I got it. Maybe negative was not the correct wording on my part, but irrelevance is a long way from what I was getting at. I was showing some appreciation to someone for coming up with alternate ideas.
The intention of posting this in the general forum, was to get opinions from as many people as possible. Before we take a vote at our next meeting, all of these opinions will be brought up, so our members can decide for themselves whether or not they want us to move forward. Tim Hunt.