female killers

Talk about Cougar Hunting with Dogs
Post Reply
cat and bear
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 557
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:04 am
Location: WI

Re: female killers

Post by cat and bear »

Kevin D wrote:The time to discuss whether or not to take a female lion is BEFORE the hunt takes place and NOT under the tree!

The argument that it's the client's tag therefore it is their choice whether or not to take a female doesn't carry a lot of weight with me. If you are honest and sincere in wanting to protect females, you tell the hunter up front that you do not allow females to be taken over your dogs.......then back it up. It is not a question of preference, it is a question of principle. Your clients and hunters will respect that.


Ethic's and peer pressure is going to get you more game, and females then the laws changed, which also needs to be part of the solution. I agree with kevin, ethic's is the foundation of any game hunted. An example here, i turn on a bobcat, and upfront the guy understands, if its caught and killed by the dogs, he still tags it and its his or we dont turn loose, after guys get the game they want, they have a short memory of what you done for them anyway, do things right, for everyone's future.
User avatar
redbone4me
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:11 pm
Location: Washington
Location: On The Right

Re: female killers

Post by redbone4me »

Mikes Hero wrote:Seriously! Posting someone's phone number and name on here and where they hunt is completely wrong! No matter what they do hunting gives you no right to post peoples names, whereabouts and phone numbers without their permission. From what you say this information about what he has killed has not been confirmed so that is called hearsay. Even if it is true and he is killing females with kittens that is something your local game and fish agency deals with not for you to play vigilante and have people call and harrass him. Your post and this topic is immature and needs to be removed!


Hey "Big Horn Posse" - This is exactly the kind of forum that we should all be calling people out on. Unless you too, are guilty of killing females and kittens, why would you worry about it? These kind of idiots, that are killing our sport should be called to the plate.

Maybe you haven't figured it out, but our F&G departments don't really care. And if they don't care, it leaves the conservation to us. So please, just shut up.



I agree with Timothy and Mike's Hero. This is the place to do it. Maybe this guy and others will now think twice because they know there's a group of people concerned and not accepting to what they are doing. They might think what they are doing is not that big of a deal but hopefully these postings will be heard by them and they will change their ways.
F&G, Police and are Government aren't always around to protect us or enforce justice, sometimes we have to do it ourselves. I'm not calling out for hangings or anything, just saying.
And if you think this is wrong then maybe you have some guilt issues? Not the same, but along the lines of child molesters, let the public know who they are and where they're at so they know they are being watched.
"A Government Big Enough to Give You Everything You Want, is Big Enough to Take Everything Away You Have".
Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
redbone4me
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:11 pm
Location: Washington
Location: On The Right

Re: female killers

Post by redbone4me »

Big Horn Posse wrote:I have only harvested one lion in my life back in 2003 and it was a mature tom. I don't care if I ever harvest another. I hunt because I love it and I love my hounds. But playing vigilante and telling who knows who what someone's phone number name and whereabouts is wrong. You don't know who is reading this board and what they are capable of. What if some crazy idiot takes matters into his own hands and does something to harm this person? You know it can happen. This is the internet and not only are there houndsmen on here, but who knows who. Seriously, think of people and their family's here. No matter what he does in the field out hunting you cannot post personal information on here about someone else. If he is breaking the law let the law handle it. That is what they are there for whether you agree with it or not.


This is just ignorant, to think the law is always going to be there? You can't be serious. Also, did I miss the phone number posting? To be this trusting in our government is just crazy. I am no way a radical anarchist, but please, get real!
"A Government Big Enough to Give You Everything You Want, is Big Enough to Take Everything Away You Have".
Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
redbone4me
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 162
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 5:11 pm
Location: Washington
Location: On The Right

Re: female killers

Post by redbone4me »

walker83 wrote:I dont know any of you "guides" so take it for what its worth, but I am pretty sure that plenty of us can go take the tests, get our guiding/outfitting license, sell a few guys a hunt, load up some dogs and kill a few females and claim its in the interest of "family, dog food, bad economy, no winter work" or whatever else you want to call it. I see it a lot different, its a selfish short sighted man that cant say "I love this, I want my kids to love this, and his kids to love this, I'll pick up some winter work that doesn't harm the lifestyle that I love "year after year(with this being the worst) I get a gut full of guides and outfitters let alone Don Peay, SFW, DWR and all the others female slaying sob's. Quit the excuse making and call it the way it is, you value your own good times/extra hunting time over the conservation of OUR lion hunting heritage. I can assure you that we will all be chasing coyotes, talking about the good times until we ALL start saying ENOUGH. I'm not about to start pointing fingers at individuals but I can agree with houndem on one thing -that all so called Utah outfitters are guilty as hell-Its pathetic and its embarrassing, if you cant even educate a hunter riding around with you for days hoping to cut a track what chance do we have of stopping the deer hunters from screaming about needing to kill more lions.


P.S.
Looks like snow tomorrow, harvest objective units are open- KILL EM ALL boys, lets get this pathetic "I'm a guide" shit over with!!!


Amen to what is written here by Walker83. Time to stop making the excuses and do what is right and be Men about this. We have to protect the future and look beyond the selfishness.
"A Government Big Enough to Give You Everything You Want, is Big Enough to Take Everything Away You Have".
Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Brent Sinclair
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:04 pm
Location: Alberta
Contact:

Re: female killers

Post by Brent Sinclair »

Alberta is making some drastic changes to our "cougar management" as they call it.
For the past several seasons the female quota has never been filled in some units and F&W say they will restructure the hunting regulations to achieve the female harvest that they feel is required..
The big issue is F&W have no idea what the current lion population is, how many females or lions are being shot by landowners or killed by accidental trapping and in snares.
Now they are implementing a non-hound boot season in most of the proviance outside of the current CMA's ( cougar management areas)
There is no current season at this time where they are adding the boot season so how can the hound guys be accountable for not achieving the female harvest.
NOTHING is being changed where they say they have the non harvested female quota.
Do we now harvest the female quota in these CMA's before they open a non-hound boot season and allow anyone to kill a lion during the ungulate season, how many will be killed or wounded is a good question.
Landowners across the proviance are now going to be allowed to keep the lion they kill on their private land...
With this now the land owner kills a lion, then out walks another one so he kills it as well...the first one was her 10 month old kitten her second kitten is now gone ...what happens now? It either dies from starvation is killed or becomes a problem cat...
I sure don't know if I have an answer for this...and "IF" there is a solution that can work...
Seems more offen than not these days the game branch wants to reduce lion numbers and killing females is their management tool that is used to achieve it weather here in Canada or in the US.
Brent Sinclair
PORCUPINE CREEK OUTFITTERS Ltd.
TROPHY HUNT AMERICA
SAFARI CONNECTION
www.trophyhuntamerica.smugmug.com
User avatar
houndnem
Babble Mouth
Babble Mouth
Posts: 1318
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 1:47 am
Location: so.Utah
Contact:

Re: female killers

Post by houndnem »

First off I want to say that I am not for the killing of females. I admitted in my first post that less than a small hand full of them have died over my dogs in the last 12 years for different reasons, or excuses whatever ya want to call it. I have never let a female hit the dirt or heard of others shooting females and felt quit right about it, but it happened and I can't change the past. I do want to offer some counter points to the anit female killer adgenda. they're not my feelings, rather just thoughts to think about. every year I hear this same debate about the harvest and the females killed etc. every year. which means there were obviously still a bunch of lions to kill right??? you can't overharvest an area that doesn't have lions????
I actually felt like I saw more tracks per days out this year than in the previous 3 years. the trophy size has dropped each year though which is unfortunate.
I myself would love to see the lion numbers back where they were in the nineties and early 2000's. it was great! great trophy size, didn't even need to dump on female tracks even when pursuing etc. that is when I developed my love for the lions and for the sport. that was when it was really fun to run hounds. on any given day you were in the hills you had a chance at a booner. but that is what got us here in the first place. the average hunter, rancher, or outdoor enthusiest looks at lions the same way we look at wolves. they are no good deer killing human killing animals that need to be exterminated. there are only two small groups of people that want lions to live, us and the tree huggers. problem is that the huggers don't want us to be able to chase or kill them. so where does that leave us? a small group of rowdy rednecks trying to take on the whole world. and worst of all none of us even get along.
if females were not killed each year and cougar sightings became common, what do you think our government would do? every time a rancher looses livestock or every time we turn on the evening news to hear that a lion was in somebodies yard it would just add to the hatred toward lions. eventually they will rage all out war with them. they had a bounty on them back in the day and if they started overpopulating you can bet your a$$ the gov't would do it again or better yet they could end hounding them and hire gov't hunters to come take care of it since the hound guys won't kill females.
I think most of us that have had dogs for a long time respect the females and don't really put a dent in the lions. for every thirty we catch maybe one or two will die. but a few bad apples are taking it too far killing every female and kitten that climbs. and the dwr is fueling the flame by making more tags available. if these guys don't have the common sense to keep from killing all the cats, what makes you think they give a dam if their name is on a list???
I don't have the answer to what we need to do, but as individuals we can only do our part. what the next guy does is on him. all we can hope for is that the dwr sees the declining age and number of females harvested and when their three years is up they adjust for it and let out fewer tags. as long as the limited entry hunters leave tags unfilled there will always be the harvest quota left open to overkill. I guess my general point is that the dwr and the rest of the world has a number of lions they can live with and it aint even close to how many we wish there were, so I'm gona continue to chase, catch and even sometimes kill the herd we have left. all things in moderation, and if all those knuckle heads would do that as well I don't think we would have need for this post.
"Houndn'Ems Blueticks" if it smells like a cat, they'll catch it.
walker83
Tight Mouth
Tight Mouth
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Utah
Location: Lion Killingest state in the west!!

Re: female killers

Post by walker83 »

A guy walks up to a hot chick and offers her $100 to have sex with him, she tells him no "I am not a prostitute", he counters with "how about for $1,000,000", she says yes, the man then says "now that we know what you are, lets negotiate on price"
coonhuntr1911
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:59 pm
Location: utah

Re: female killers

Post by coonhuntr1911 »

I am sure glad to see all the people who are coming out in favour of the mountain lions. I think we need to get the word out to the right people like those who make the laws and make some changes where changes need to be made.
M Evertsen
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:27 pm
Location: Nevada
Location: Somewhere looking for my dogs in the mountains of

Re: female killers

Post by M Evertsen »

houndnem wrote:First off I want to say that I am not for the killing of females. I admitted in my first post that less than a small hand full of them have died over my dogs in the last 12 years for different reasons, or excuses whatever ya want to call it. I have never let a female hit the dirt or heard of others shooting females and felt quit right about it, but it happened and I can't change the past. I do want to offer some counter points to the anit female killer adgenda. they're not my feelings, rather just thoughts to think about. every year I hear this same debate about the harvest and the females killed etc. every year. which means there were obviously still a bunch of lions to kill right??? you can't overharvest an area that doesn't have lions????
I actually felt like I saw more tracks per days out this year than in the previous 3 years. the trophy size has dropped each year though which is unfortunate.
I myself would love to see the lion numbers back where they were in the nineties and early 2000's. it was great! great trophy size, didn't even need to dump on female tracks even when pursuing etc. that is when I developed my love for the lions and for the sport. that was when it was really fun to run hounds. on any given day you were in the hills you had a chance at a booner. but that is what got us here in the first place. the average hunter, rancher, or outdoor enthusiest looks at lions the same way we look at wolves. they are no good deer killing human killing animals that need to be exterminated. there are only two small groups of people that want lions to live, us and the tree huggers. problem is that the huggers don't want us to be able to chase or kill them. so where does that leave us? a small group of rowdy rednecks trying to take on the whole world. and worst of all none of us even get along.
if females were not killed each year and cougar sightings became common, what do you think our government would do? every time a rancher looses livestock or every time we turn on the evening news to hear that a lion was in somebodies yard it would just add to the hatred toward lions. eventually they will rage all out war with them. they had a bounty on them back in the day and if they started overpopulating you can bet your a$$ the gov't would do it again or better yet they could end hounding them and hire gov't hunters to come take care of it since the hound guys won't kill females.
I think most of us that have had dogs for a long time respect the females and don't really put a dent in the lions. for every thirty we catch maybe one or two will die. but a few bad apples are taking it too far killing every female and kitten that climbs. and the dwr is fueling the flame by making more tags available. if these guys don't have the common sense to keep from killing all the cats, what makes you think they give a dam if their name is on a list???
I don't have the answer to what we need to do, but as individuals we can only do our part. what the next guy does is on him. all we can hope for is that the dwr sees the declining age and number of females harvested and when their three years is up they adjust for it and let out fewer tags. as long as the limited entry hunters leave tags unfilled there will always be the harvest quota left open to overkill. I guess my general point is that the dwr and the rest of the world has a number of lions they can live with and it aint even close to how many we wish there were, so I'm gona continue to chase, catch and even sometimes kill the herd we have left. all things in moderation, and if all those knuckle heads would do that as well I don't think we would have need for this post.


Very well said. Letting all the females go, and only killing mature toms is only going to add fuel to the fire of the people who hate lions already. Lions do need to be killed, and a wide range of ages and of both sexes need to be accounted for to keep our sport of hounding alive and keep the Gov't hunters as well as the lion haters off our backs. We want all these lions to run, but no one thinks of who writes the checks to the game and fish, and who they will listen to more. Keep the lions at a number where we can still enjoy them with our dogs, and low enough to keep the fish and game from saying we aren't being productive enough, and other means must be impemented to take care of the problem, such as poisoning, snaring, trapping, airplane shooting, and other ways to kill lions that we as houndsmen would not enjoy.
The quality of a person's life is in direct proportion to their commitment to excellence, regardless of their chosen field of endeavor. - Vince Lombardi
timothy
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Utah

Re: female killers

Post by timothy »

M Evertsen wrote:Very well said. Letting all the females go, and only killing mature toms is only going to add fuel to the fire of the people who hate lions already. Lions do need to be killed, and a wide range of ages and of both sexes need to be accounted for to keep our sport of hounding alive and keep the Gov't hunters as well as the lion haters off our backs. We want all these lions to run, but no one thinks of who writes the checks to the game and fish, and who they will listen to more. Keep the lions at a number where we can still enjoy them with our dogs, and low enough to keep the fish and game from saying we aren't being productive enough, and other means must be impemented to take care of the problem, such as poisoning, snaring, trapping, airplane shooting, and other ways to kill lions that we as houndsmen would not enjoy.


That sounds good in theory, If the lion population was currently at a healthy level then that would be feasible. However except in a few areas the lion populations are terrible and the killing of even on female is not sustainable. If you say you are a houndsmen I do not see how you can justify killing lions to the point that they are today. We need to unite under one cause and quit making excuses for the ones who choose to throw it all away. If we can show up to the RAC meetings in mass with one point of view we can change it for the better. Only we can do it though, no one else will do it for us.
User avatar
Big Horn Posse
Babble Mouth
Babble Mouth
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Wyoming
Facebook ID: 100000145082247
Location: The Backcountry
Contact:

Re: female killers

Post by Big Horn Posse »

redbone4me wrote:
Big Horn Posse wrote:I have only harvested one lion in my life back in 2003 and it was a mature tom. I don't care if I ever harvest another. I hunt because I love it and I love my hounds. But playing vigilante and telling who knows who what someone's phone number name and whereabouts is wrong. You don't know who is reading this board and what they are capable of. What if some crazy idiot takes matters into his own hands and does something to harm this person? You know it can happen. This is the internet and not only are there houndsmen on here, but who knows who. Seriously, think of people and their family's here. No matter what he does in the field out hunting you cannot post personal information on here about someone else. If he is breaking the law let the law handle it. That is what they are there for whether you agree with it or not.


This is just ignorant, to think the law is always going to be there? You can't be serious. Also, did I miss the phone number posting? To be this trusting in our government is just crazy. I am no way a radical anarchist, but please, get real!


Well the law can't be everywhere all the time, but if you know someone is doing something illegal it is up to you to report it. I have the Sheridan, Buffalo, and Kaycee warden's numbers on my phone to do just that and I have used them to report possible poaching and wildlife violations. I care about all wildlife not just lions as any wildlife violation effects us all. Also Timothy had posted the guys phone number in one of his first posts and then removed it which was the right thing to do.
I like my men like I like my mountains...... Rugged, challenging, and WILD!!!

Big Horn Posse Big Game Hounds
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Big-Horn ... e=bookmark

Image
Yard Dog
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:16 am
Location: Utah

Re: female killers

Post by Yard Dog »

houndnem wrote: I do want to offer some counter points to the anit female killer adgenda. they're not my feelings, rather just thoughts to think about. every year I hear this same debate about the harvest and the females killed etc. every year. which means there were obviously still a bunch of lions to kill right??? you can't overharvest an area that doesn't have lions????


Glad to hear these are not "your fellings" because they make absolutely no sense. How does complaints about killing females and declining lion populations in our state mean we "obviously still have a bunch of lion to kill"? :shock:
"you can't overharvest an area that does not have lions"...wow...I thought the point was many areas of the state are being overharvested, hence the lack of lions. And killing females only compounds this problem.

M Evertsen wrote:Very well said. Letting all the females go, and only killing mature toms is only going to add fuel to the fire of the people who hate lions already. Lions do need to be killed, and a wide range of ages and of both sexes need to be accounted for to keep our sport of hounding alive and keep the Gov't hunters as well as the lion haters off our backs.


Who are these lion haters? The DWR is for sure. Ranchers, who have never had an animal just get sick and die. They were always killed by a bear, lion or somthing. You will never make them happy so why try? As far as government hunters, don't think they will ever lay any of them off. Don't think the public at large hates lions. So should we just keep indiscriminately wacking anything we can catch just to be on the safe side? I think not.
Last edited by Yard Dog on Sun Mar 20, 2011 3:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Yard Dog
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 168
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:16 am
Location: Utah

Re: female killers

Post by Yard Dog »

redbone4me wrote:This is just ignorant, to think the law is always going to be there? You can't be serious. Also, did I miss the phone number posting? To be this trusting in our government is just crazy. I am no way a radical anarchist, but please, get real!


Big Horn Posse wrote:Well the law can't be everywhere all the time, but if you know someone is doing something illegal it is up to you to report it.


I think what he was getting at is that the states wildlife regulations are not always in the best interest of what is good for our game animals.
God knows if they were they would have shut our deer hunts down years ago....
timothy
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Utah

Re: female killers

Post by timothy »

Big horn you stil do not get it, it is not about being illegal. It is not illegal to kill a female in Utah. It is about conserving what we have left, sometimes a female may die I get that. But when a guy is going out and killing them without reguard that is the problem. Ive heard of even the most experienced lion hunters calling a big female a tom that happens. but when i guy kills a 70- 80 lbs female that is just wrong. not illegal but wrong. We all get it you are in tight with your fish cops good for you! maybe next time you punch out a tag incorrectly they wont arrest you now.
User avatar
Big Horn Posse
Babble Mouth
Babble Mouth
Posts: 1207
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:26 pm
Location: Wyoming
Facebook ID: 100000145082247
Location: The Backcountry
Contact:

Re: female killers

Post by Big Horn Posse »

Timothy, I do get what your saying and Im not disagreeing with you on the whole female issue. I don't like it when ANY young lion gets harvested. You have no idea what I've done the last 10 years as far as hunting and conservation. I have only harvested one lion in the last 10 years. When I was hunting only national forest I let them all go and at least one was a booner tom. Now that I am back in Kaycee I hunt, private, blm, and national forest. This is a ranching community and lions need to be managed here a little different than national forest. Ranchers own the property and they control what they want on it. I understand all the sides here. The ranchers need to make a living without worrying about predator loss. I have seen the depredation reports over the years and know what kind of impact predators have on livestock. Now, just so you understand not every depredation is a confirmed lion kill. Some are eagales, coyotes and wolves. A warden has to confirm it first. There are many that are not confirmed and the ranchers do not get paid. If it is a confirmed lion kill then it will be run with hounds or snared. That is just how it is. I also can understand how the WG&F decide what the mortality quotas are going to be for different areas. They not only go by the amount of depredations each year they go by what was harvested and where. Sheridan used to have a female mortality quota and they did away with it because they were having more and more problems with cats coming into town. Why was that? Maybe the younger transient lions could not set up residency on the mountain cause there were already cats in those areas. Maybe it is cause their food supply was down as our deer numbers have been down due to drought and other natural causes. Either way they adjusted the quotas on factors like that. Trust me Timothy I have done the research myself. I visited with my warden here yesterday and spoke at length with him about this. He showed me the harvest reports of everything that has been checked in here this year. The majority were 3 to 4 yr old toms. There was a couple 3 to 4 yr old females and at least 1 or 2 6 to 7 yr old toms. What that tells me are houndsmen are harvesting more younger transient cats than older resident ones. This hasn't changed in the last 10 years. I have all the harvest reports from 2000 and it all reads the same. Do we have a healthy lion population, I couldn't tell you for sure what a healthy lion population is. Is it 1 lion per 50 miles or 10 lions per 50 miles. Unless there is a study done on them in a given area no one knows for sure. I do know that in all the years I have been hunting them that if you take a lion out of an area another will move in if the habitat is good. Transient lions also travel great distances. Read some of the studies that have been done in the past. Collared cats in Wyoming have ended up as far as Kanasas and California. Maybe if you are not finding the lions in your area there are other reasons than blaming it all on females being harvested. I am not defending the harvest of females in any way here, but you need to look at all the reasons, habitat, food source, urban areas moving in, ect. All these factors play a part in if you will have lions in an area. Go talk with your G&F department. Get the harvest and depredation reports and see what is really going on. Education is the key to conservation and if you have the information you can look at things as they really are.

As for me punching a tag wrong, well as I said I have only harvested one lion so I don't think that will be a problem. And there is nothing wrong with working with the G&F instead of being against them. It is mindsets like your's that make the G&F think all houndsmen are outlaws.
I like my men like I like my mountains...... Rugged, challenging, and WILD!!!

Big Horn Posse Big Game Hounds
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Big-Horn ... e=bookmark

Image
Post Reply

Return to “Lion Hunting”