320 vs 220

This is an area for Helping with Garmin Questions, Any posted References or posted Advertisements for selling Products will be removed. This is not a Place to Post your items for Sale, or Ask where to buy products.
Post Reply
brian j cerelli
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:34 pm
Location: north west oregon

320 vs 220

Post by brian j cerelli »

im not sure if this has already been talked about, but i have 2 or the 220's and was thinking about getting a 320 and selling one of the 220's.
what are the main differences between the two? i know i can only track 10 dogs with either unit(thats why i have 2 of them). but i was wondering when i scroll in the map view, if the screen was faster on the 320 then the 220.
any info would be great! thanks
timothy
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Utah

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by timothy »

Its alot faster, the compass is better. The orange is awsome ( i dropped mine the first night i got it and was able to find it easy) I like the birds eye view, its not a huge advantage but its neat. All around I think it functions better. But mine eats batteries twice as fast as the 220.
timothy
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Utah

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by timothy »

Thought i would tell you how bad mine is with batteries. At about half batt. life the backlight will not work to conserve energy. Last sunday I was out all day and ended up using 6 batteries to keep the backlight. If I had waited until they fully died i would have used 4
Mackdog

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by Mackdog »

I use the 220. What gives the 320 the extra 2 mile range? Is the difference in range noticable?
timothy
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Utah

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by timothy »

I lose line of site way before that
Steve White
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 511
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:59 am
Location: wi
Location: St Germain,WI
Contact:

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by Steve White »

Mack. the extra range claim comes from the longer rubbery duck antenna that comes with it.

As for batteries. It is best to use rechargeables in them. I get a full day from mine with them. Good batteries make a huge difference in everything. Had my daughter pick me up one for our shock system. She brought home a heavy duty cheapy. Pulled the trigger twice and it was dead!

Just a better unit overall.
Steve White
White's Woods & Waters
http://www.whiteswoodsandwaters.com
steve@whiteswoodsandwaters.com
715-892-0032
Mackdog

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by Mackdog »

I just got the flexible antenna for my 220 in the mail today. I had the expandable/foldable antenna and loved but I lost it while hiking into a lion tree. My 220 should have the range of the 320 with the aftermarket antenna. Doesn't seem like theres enough of a difference in the 320, using twice as much juice isn't worth the fancy orange case and higher price tag. I plan on running the 220/DC30 setup until a reliable system with significantly longer range hits the market.
User avatar
catdogs
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 616
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:05 am
Location: MT
Facebook ID: 100001341185120
Contact:

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by catdogs »

Its alot faster, the compass is better. The orange is awsome ( i dropped mine the first night i got it and was able to find it easy) I like the birds eye view, its not a huge advantage but its neat. All around I think it functions better. But mine eats batteries twice as fast as the 220.


+1 The compass needs to be calibrated more often on the 320 and it takes a lot longer to do so. The 320's are battery eating SOB's! I do not find a range difference with the 320 or 220 tho it does make a diffference if you sue the longer 320 anntennae.
Once you go black, you'll never go back! Duncan big game Black and Tans.
timothy
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Utah

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by timothy »

My batteries are free so I just deal with it :P
timothy
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:48 am
Location: Utah

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by timothy »

Oh one feature I have never used since all my budds are cheap asses and havnt bought a 320 yet. You can share collar info wirelessly so that you dont have to spend 30 minutes synching collars
Steve White
Open Mouth
Open Mouth
Posts: 511
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 1:59 am
Location: wi
Location: St Germain,WI
Contact:

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by Steve White »

You really need to be using the rechargeable batteries. Anything else is going to add up fast, and like normal the rechargeable will save you money. 4pk of energizer with charger under $30.
Steve White
White's Woods & Waters
http://www.whiteswoodsandwaters.com
steve@whiteswoodsandwaters.com
715-892-0032
beardog-treed
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:35 pm
Facebook ID: 0
Location: Pine Bush, New York
Contact:

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by beardog-treed »

I use the new advanced lithium batteries in my units. I own both 220 and 320. I can get almost a week on the 320 with these batteries. However they cost about 8-9 bucks for 4 of them!
LARSENS BLACK BEAR KENNEL & SUPPLY

GREG LARSEN

1149 BURLINGHAM ROAD

PINE BUSH, NY 12566
brian j cerelli
Bawl Mouth
Bawl Mouth
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 2:34 pm
Location: north west oregon

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by brian j cerelli »

well i am going to get the 320 and see how it works, i got a good deal and dont want to pass it up. thanks for the input.
bodycount
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:49 am
Location: Ontario Canada

Re: 320 vs 220

Post by bodycount »

plott/walker Are gang got 7, 320 units this fall. We run coyotes 5/6 days a week and no one in the group has any trouble with the 320 at all. I do agree that you need to run rechargeable batteries in the 320. I get about 2 days out of a set of batteries .

Bodycount
Post Reply

Return to “Garmin Astro Help Topics”