reed wrote: It isn't about kamakaze dogs its about opertunistic gritty dogs. In essence he is saying do you want to chase the bear or do you want to catch the bear? It is about the dog work.
I agree with you reed, it is most definitely about the dog work, that is why I have stayed in hounds for so long. The thrill of killing bears wore off for me quite a few years ago. I feed my dogs so I can catch bear.
I think the distinction that we are trying to debate is what the definition of a gritty dog is. Some guys think a gritty dog is one that comes back with holes in it every other time it's turned loose. It doesn't take too many holes and you have a dead dog. That kind of dog has more grits than brains. Vet bills get old real quick.
To me a gritty dog is one that catches the bears I put it one, without being bit or swatted. Over the years I've had plenty of dogs that could catch mean bear without being hurt. Those kinds of dogs have the type of grit that I like. Each time I turn my dogs loose I expect to catch a bear and as long as they do that the majority of the time, then I'll keep feeding them.


