The Commission says they do not recommend it *YET*, like I have said in the past, I have heard the zone proposal from several DFG mucky mucks and now here it is in black and white.
Read the reason's for this proposal, it is so that they can have more control over the killing in certain bear populations....why?
Well here in the county I live in it would be safe to say that over half the kill is from guides and out of state hunters, we never used to have this pressure.
BUT INSTEAD OF PROPOSING TO MORE CLOSELY REGULATE THE KILLING DONE BY GUIDES AND OUT OF STATE HUNTERS THEY PROPOSE TO SCREW THE LOCALS.
How would that happen? Well the zone (or BMU) that I and most of my friends live (live meaning I pay taxes in this county and state and have to put up with CADFG's laws 365 days a year) in would recieve the second least amount of tags out of the zones. Our allowed kill would also be one of the lowest. So if this proposal gets adopted now or in the future we will have to sit around at home, hoping to draw a bear tag (the same tags that all the out of staters are putting in for) and hope to get some hunting in before the guides and out of staters have killed enough to close the season in our unit...this is bulls%*t!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Its time to do something about this, almost every other state that allows bear hunting has restricitons on the amount guides are allowed to kill and on out of state hunters...are we just going to keep burying our heads in the sand....? If you are worried we will lose support then go and look at donations made to CHC and COHA, see how many donations come from out of state people and how many donations come from people you know guide (legal or not)...we won't lose anything but OUR right to hunt in OUR state if we continue to ignore this
Hope I'll see you all in Sacramento on Thursday. Please download the Draft Environmental Document and read it, its available on the CADFG Comission website.




